linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add Kryo 560 CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <872977d9-e920-d4c3-0022-412095ff6516@somainline.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:51:20 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/17] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add Kryo 560 CPUs


On 23.09.2021 18:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:21:47 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Document Kryo 560 CPUs found in Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (SM6350).
>>
>> Reviewed-by:  AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
It was an overlook from my side. Totally didn't mean to skip the acks/r-bs.

Apologies for the inconvenience caused.


Konrad