[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202109240824.2B4C0B7EC@keescook>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:26:10 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: Remove the unnecessary arguments from
arch_ptrace_stop
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:10:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Both arch_ptrace_stop_needed and arch_ptrace_stop are called with an
> exit_code and a siginfo structure. Neither argument is used by any of
> the implementations so just remove the unneeded arguments.
>
> The two arechitectures that implement arch_ptrace_stop are ia64 and
> sparc. Both architectures flush their register stacks before a
> ptrace_stack so that all of the register information can be accessed
> by debuggers.
>
> As the question of if a register stack needs to be flushed is
> independent of why ptrace is stopping not needing arguments make sense.
>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Yeah, this is a no-op change. No one is using the arguments, as you say.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists