| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:01:46 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 20:30:26 +0100,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Add a driver for the Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller.
>
> This supports external pins being used as interrupts. It supports
> one line for NMI, 8 external pins and 32 GPIO pins (out of 123)
> to be used as IRQ lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 9 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 404 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 4d5924e9f766..b61dceac8628 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -236,6 +236,15 @@ config RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC
> Enable support for the Renesas RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller, to use up
> to 8 external interrupts with configurable sense select.
>
> +config RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC
> + bool "Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC support" if COMPILE_TEST
> + select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> + help
> + Enable support for the Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller for external
> + devices.
> +
> config SL28CPLD_INTC
> bool "Kontron sl28cpld IRQ controller"
> depends on MFD_SL28CPLD=y || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index f88cbf36a9d2..8017786fbdac 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RDA_INTC) += irq-rda-intc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN) += irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_IRQC) += irq-renesas-irqc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC) += irq-renesas-rza1.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC) += irq-renesas-rzg2l.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ) += irq-versatile-fpga.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NSPIRE) += irq-zevio.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500) += irq-vt8500.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8057fdf6781b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corporation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdesc.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +
> +#define IRQC_IRQ_START 1
> +#define IRQC_IRQ_COUNT 8
> +#define IRQC_TINT_START 9
> +#define IRQC_TINT_COUNT 32
> +#define IRQC_NUM_IRQ 41
> +
> +#define ISCR 0x10
> +#define IITSR 0x14
> +#define TSCR 0x20
> +#define TITSR0 0x24
> +#define TITSR1 0x28
> +#define TITSR0_MAX_INT 16
> +#define TITSEL_WIDTH 0x2
> +#define TSSR(n) (0x30 + ((n) * 4))
> +#define TIEN BIT(7)
> +#define TSSEL_SHIFT(n) (8 * (n))
> +#define TSSEL_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define IRQ_MASK 0x3
> +
> +#define TSSR_OFFSET(n) ((n) % 4)
> +#define TSSR_INDEX(n) ((n) / 4)
> +
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING 0
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING 1
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_HIGH 2
> +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_LOW 3
> +
> +struct rzg2l_irqc_priv {
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct irq_chip chip;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> + struct resource *irq[IRQC_NUM_IRQ];
> + struct mutex irqc_mutex;
> + struct mutex tint_mutex; /* Mutex to protect tint_slot bitmap */
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(tint_slot, IRQC_TINT_COUNT);
> +};
> +
> +struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data {
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv;
> + int tint;
> + int hwirq;
> +};
> +
> +static int rzg2l_tint_set_edge(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
> + unsigned int hwirq, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + u32 port = hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> + u8 sense;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING;
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING;
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_HIGH;
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_LOW;
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
Have you tested this code with lockdep? This cannot possibly work,
since all the irqchip callbacks are running under a per-irq raw
spinlock.
> + if (port < TITSR0_MAX_INT) {
> + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TITSR0);
> + reg &= ~(IRQ_MASK << (port * TITSEL_WIDTH));
> + reg |= sense << (port * TITSEL_WIDTH);
> + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TITSR0);
> + } else {
> + port = port / TITSEL_WIDTH;
> + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TITSR1);
> + reg &= ~(IRQ_MASK << (port * TITSEL_WIDTH));
> + reg |= sense << (port * TITSEL_WIDTH);
> + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TITSR1);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_tint_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = chip_data->priv;
> + unsigned int offset;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> + offset = chip_data->hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> + generic_handle_domain_irq(priv->irq_domain, chip_data->hwirq);
> + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSCR) & ~BIT(offset);
> + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSCR);
What is this operation? If that's an ack, it is way too late. And
whether it is an ack or an eoi, it must be in a callback.
> + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = chip_data->priv;
> +
> + if (chip_data->tint != -EINVAL) {
> + u32 offset = chip_data->hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> + u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> + u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(priv->irq[chip_data->hwirq]->start,
> + NULL, NULL);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> + reg &= ~(TSSEL_MASK << tssr_offset);
> + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = chip_data->priv;
> +
> + if (chip_data->tint != -EINVAL) {
> + u32 offset = chip_data->hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> + u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> + u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(priv->irq[chip_data->hwirq]->start,
> + rzg2l_irqc_tint_irq_handler,
> + chip_data);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> + reg |= (TIEN | chip_data->tint) << TSSEL_SHIFT(tssr_offset);
> + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> + }
> +}
These two function make little sense. Why isn't the chained handler
wired once and for all?
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = chip_data->priv;
> +
> + if (chip_data->tint != EINVAL)
> + return rzg2l_tint_set_edge(priv, chip_data->hwirq, type);
Inline this function here. There is no point in having this helper on
its own with a single call site.
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = domain->host_data;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = NULL;
> + struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = arg;
> + int tint = -EINVAL;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + int irq = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned int type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + chip_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Why do you need to allocate per interrupt chip-specific data?
> +
> + ret = irq_domain_translate_twocell(domain, arg, &hwirq, &type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * When alloc has landed from pinctrl driver:
> + * fwspec->param_count = 3
> + * fwspec->param[0] = tint
> + * fwspec->param[1] = type
> + * fwspec->param[2] = 1
> + */
> + if (fwspec->param_count == 3 && fwspec->param[2]) {
> + mutex_lock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + irq = bitmap_find_free_region(priv->tint_slot, IRQC_TINT_COUNT, get_order(1));
I think you can replace this get_order() with the result.
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + return -ENOSPC;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + tint = hwirq;
> + hwirq = irq + IRQC_TINT_START;
> + }
> +
> + chip_data->priv = priv;
> + chip_data->tint = tint;
> + chip_data->hwirq = hwirq;
Really?
> + ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, &priv->chip, chip_data);
> + if (ret)
> + goto release_bitmap;
> +
> + /* parent is GIC */
> + parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + parent_fwspec.param_count = 3;
> + parent_fwspec.param[0] = 0; /* SPI */
> + parent_fwspec.param[1] = priv->irq[hwirq]->start;
> + parent_fwspec.param[2] = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
> + ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, &parent_fwspec);
> + if (ret)
> + goto release_bitmap;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_bitmap:
> + if (tint != -EINVAL) {
> + mutex_lock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + bitmap_release_region(priv->tint_slot, irq, get_order(1));
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + }
> + kfree(chip_data);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void rzg2l_irqc_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv;
> + struct irq_data *d;
> +
> + d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> + if (d) {
> + chip_data = d->chip_data;
> + priv = chip_data->priv;
> + if (chip_data) {
> + if (chip_data->tint != -EINVAL) {
> + mutex_lock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + bitmap_release_region(priv->tint_slot,
> + chip_data->hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START,
> + get_order(1));
> + mutex_unlock(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + }
> + kfree(chip_data);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops rzg2l_irqc_domain_ops = {
> + .alloc = rzg2l_irqc_domain_alloc,
> + .free = rzg2l_irqc_domain_free,
> + .translate = irq_domain_translate_twocell,
> +};
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *parent_irq_domain;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct device_node *gic_node;
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> + priv->dev = dev;
> +
> + priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> +
> + gic_node = of_irq_find_parent(np);
> + if (gic_node)
> + parent_irq_domain = irq_find_host(gic_node);
> +
> + if (!parent_irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot find parent domain\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < IRQC_NUM_IRQ; i++) {
> + priv->irq[i] = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, i);
> + if (!priv->irq[i]) {
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get irq resource(%u)", i);
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mutex_init(&priv->irqc_mutex);
> + mutex_init(&priv->tint_mutex);
> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + priv->chip.name = "rzg2l-irqc";
> + priv->chip.irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent;
> + priv->chip.irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent;
> + priv->chip.irq_enable = rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable;
> + priv->chip.irq_disable = rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable;
> + priv->chip.irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
> + priv->chip.irq_set_type = rzg2l_irqc_set_type;
Move the irqchip structure out of rzg2l_irqc_priv, make it
static. There is no reason why it should be dynamically allocated and
not shared across all instances.
> + priv->chip.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
> + priv->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_irq_domain, 0,
> + IRQC_NUM_IRQ, np,
> + &rzg2l_irqc_domain_ops,
> + priv);
Why a hierarchy? This isn't a hierarchical setup at all.
> + if (!priv->irq_domain) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cannot initialize irq domain\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + goto out_put_node;
> + }
> +
> +out_put_node:
> + of_node_put(gic_node);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_irqc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + irq_domain_remove(priv->irq_domain);
> + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
No. interrupt controllers cannot be removed. Once in, they don't
leave.
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rzg2l_irqc_dt_ids[] = {
> + { .compatible = "renesas,rzg2l-irqc" },
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rzg2l_irqc_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rzg2l_irqc_device_driver = {
> + .probe = rzg2l_irqc_probe,
> + .remove = rzg2l_irqc_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "renesas_rzg2l_irqc",
> + .of_match_table = rzg2l_irqc_dt_ids,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rzg2l_irqc_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&rzg2l_irqc_device_driver);
> +}
> +postcore_initcall(rzg2l_irqc_init);
> +
> +static void __exit rzg2l_irqc_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&rzg2l_irqc_device_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(rzg2l_irqc_exit);
Please use the relevant irqchip helpers to declare an irqchip module:
IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_BEGIN, IRQCHIP_MATCH,
IRQCHIP_PLATFORM_DRIVER_END.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists