[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210924125422.358374d83cdb95db055a4467@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:54:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] zram: Introduce an aged idle interface
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:11:28 -0700 Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com> wrote:
> This change introduces an aged idle interface to the existing
> idle sysfs file for zram.
>
> When CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING is enabled the idle file
> now also accepts an integer argument. This integer is the
> age (in seconds) of pages to mark as idle. The idle file
> still supports 'all' as it always has. This new approach
> allows for much more control over which pages get marked
> as idle.
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - Andrew's suggestions to use IS_ENABLED and
> cleanup comment.
Also this?
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-introduce-an-aged-idle-interface-v5-fix
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -309,9 +309,8 @@ static void mark_idle(struct zram *zram,
zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
if (zram_allocated(zram, index) &&
!zram_test_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_UNDER_WB)) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZRAM_MEMORY_TRACKING))
is_idle = (!cutoff || ktime_after(cutoff, zram->table[index].ac_time));
-#endif
if (is_idle)
zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_IDLE);
}
_
Powered by blists - more mailing lists