lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:04:49 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce: Get rid of the ->quirk_no_way_out()
 indirect call

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 05:11:08PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:51:49PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:

...

> > Do you recommend this create another quirk flag and follow this patch? Or
> > should the quirks be grouped together somehow?
> 
> Does that quirk match machines with mce_flags.smca=1 per chance?
> 
> :-)
> 

Yes, at the moment it does. So I'll use that. Thanks!

> Also, your test:
> 
> +	if ((m->mcgstatus & (MCG_STATUS_EIPV|MCG_STATUS_RIPV)) != 0)
> +		return;
> 
> should be
> 
> +	if ((m->mcgstatus & (MCG_STATUS_EIPV|MCG_STATUS_RIPV)) ==
> 			    (MCG_STATUS_EIPV|MCG_STATUS_RIPV))
> +		return;
> 
> methinks.
> 
> Unless I'm misunderstanding the erratum ofc...
> 
> --

The check is intended to catch the case where both bits are 0. But I'll
double-check with the hardware folks.

Thanks,
Yazen 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ