lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 16:04:39 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Thomas WeiƟschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Expose request_module via syscall

On 9/24/21 06:19, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 01:06:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

> I just meant that the programs in the container can see the modules
> available on the host. Simplest thing could be bind-mounting in the
> host's module folder with suitable protection (locked read-only mount).
> But yeah, it can likely be as simple as allowing it to ask for a module
> and not bother telling it about what is available.
> 

If the container gets to see host modules, interesting races when 
containers are migrated CRIU-style will result.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists