lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210924074857.qbwdammzfujk4ozi@gilmour>
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:48:57 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 24 (m68k allmodconfig & drm/vc4/)

Hi

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:54:49PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/23/21 9:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20210923:
> > 
> 
> from commit 36e9bcb8edfc in linux-next:
> 
> 
> m68k allmodconfig:
> 
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PM
>   Depends on [n]: !MMU [=y]
>   Selected by [m]:
>   - DRM_VC4 [=m] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && (ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && DRM [=m] && SND [=m] && SND_SOC [=m] && COMMON_CLK [=y]

I don't really know how to fix this one, should we move that select to
the ARCH_* symbol, or something else?

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ