[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f469308-3c1c-dd9e-2c47-fcbd26b197df@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:44:24 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support
On 23.09.21 19:53, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Demote page functionality will split a huge page into a number of huge
> pages of a smaller size. For example, on x86 a 1GB huge page can be
> demoted into 512 2M huge pages. Demotion is done 'in place' by simply
> splitting the huge page.
>
> Added '*_for_demote' wrappers for remove_hugetlb_page,
> destroy_compound_gigantic_page and prep_compound_gigantic_page for use
> by demote code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 2317d411243d..ab7bd0434057 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> ((node = hstate_next_node_to_free(hs, mask)) || 1); \
> nr_nodes--)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> +/* used to demote non-gigantic_huge pages as well */
> static void __destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> unsigned int order, bool demote)
> {
> @@ -1283,6 +1283,13 @@ static void __destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> __ClearPageHead(page);
> }
>
> +static void destroy_compound_gigantic_page_for_demote(struct page *page,
> + unsigned int order)
> +{
> + __destroy_compound_gigantic_page(page, order, true);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> static void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page,
> unsigned int order)
> {
> @@ -1428,6 +1435,12 @@ static void remove_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
> __remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, adjust_surplus, false);
> }
>
> +static void remove_hugetlb_page_for_demote(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
> + bool adjust_surplus)
> +{
> + __remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, adjust_surplus, true);
> +}
> +
> static void add_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
> bool adjust_surplus)
> {
> @@ -1777,6 +1790,12 @@ static bool prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> return __prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, order, false);
> }
>
> +static bool prep_compound_gigantic_page_for_demote(struct page *page,
> + unsigned int order)
> +{
> + return __prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, order, true);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * PageHuge() only returns true for hugetlbfs pages, but not for normal or
> * transparent huge pages. See the PageTransHuge() documentation for more
> @@ -3298,9 +3317,55 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int demote_free_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> +{
> + int i, nid = page_to_nid(page);
> + struct hstate *target_hstate;
> + bool cma_page = HPageCma(page);
> +
> + target_hstate = size_to_hstate(PAGE_SIZE << h->demote_order);
> +
> + remove_hugetlb_page_for_demote(h, page, false);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> + if (alloc_huge_page_vmemmap(h, page)) {
> + /* Allocation of vmemmmap failed, we can not demote page */
> + spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> + set_page_refcounted(page);
> + add_hugetlb_page(h, page, false);
I dislike using 0/1 as return values as it will just hide the actual issue.
This here would be -ENOMEM, right?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists