[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210924124332.547892561@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:43:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 09/50] ARM: Qualify enabling of swiotlb_init()
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
commit fcf044891c84e38fc90eb736b818781bccf94e38 upstream.
We do not need a SWIOTLB unless we have DRAM that is addressable beyond
the arm_dma_limit. Compare max_pfn with arm_dma_pfn_limit to determine
whether we do need a SWIOTLB to be initialized.
Fixes: ad3c7b18c5b3 ("arm: use swiotlb for bounce buffering on LPAE configs")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -469,7 +469,11 @@ static void __init free_highpages(void)
void __init mem_init(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
- swiotlb_init(1);
+ if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
+ max_pfn > arm_dma_pfn_limit)
+ swiotlb_init(1);
+ else
+ swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
#endif
set_max_mapnr(pfn_to_page(max_pfn) - mem_map);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists