linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.69-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YU8MmXDKrHi1SLQh@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:48:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.69-rc1 review

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 09:12:04AM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 9/24/21 7:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.69 release.
> > There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:43:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.69-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Regressions detected.
> 
> While building Perf for arm, arm64, i386 and x86, all with GCC 11, the following error was encountered:
> 
>   util/dso.c: In function 'dso__build_id_equal':
>   util/dso.c:1345:26: error: implicit declaration of function 'memchr_inv'; did you mean 'memchr'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    1345 |                         !memchr_inv(&dso->bid.data[bid->size], 0,
>         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~
>         |                          memchr
>   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>   make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/tools/build/Makefile.build:96: /home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/current/util/dso.o] Error 1
> 
> To reproduce this build locally (for instance):
>   tuxmake \
>     --target-arch=x86_64 \
>     --kconfig=defconfig \
>     --kconfig-add=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/sumo/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft.config \
>     --kconfig-add=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/sumo/recipes-kernel/linux/files/lkft-crypto.config \
>     --kconfig-add=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/sumo/recipes-kernel/linux/files/distro-overrides.config \
>     --kconfig-add=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/sumo/recipes-kernel/linux/files/systemd.config \
>     --kconfig-add=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Linaro/meta-lkft/sumo/recipes-kernel/linux/files/virtio.config \
>     --kconfig-add=CONFIG_IGB=y \
>     --kconfig-add=CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER=y \
>     --kconfig-add=CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS=y \
>     --toolchain=gcc-11 \
>     --runtime=podman \
>     perf

Thanks, will go pick up the needed string.h change for this.

greg k-h