[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210925125042.1629-2-caihuoqing@baidu.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 20:50:39 +0800
From: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
To: <caihuoqing@...du.com>
CC: Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
"Steve Glendinning" <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] net: broadcom: Fix a function name in comments
Use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of pci_alloc_consistent(),
because only dma_alloc_coherent() is called here.
Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
index fa784953c601..38b465452902 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/b44.c
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ static int b44_alloc_consistent(struct b44 *bp, gfp_t gfp)
bp->rx_ring = dma_alloc_coherent(bp->sdev->dma_dev, size,
&bp->rx_ring_dma, gfp);
if (!bp->rx_ring) {
- /* Allocation may have failed due to pci_alloc_consistent
+ /* Allocation may have failed due to dma_alloc_coherent
insisting on use of GFP_DMA, which is more restrictive
than necessary... */
struct dma_desc *rx_ring;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists