lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBHDTCkBBxP9u-Qh_k6ZSswJ_5XDL9oq2CSEkWG23dXfw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 19:12:28 +0200 From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] regulator: pwm-regulator: Make use of the helper function dev_err_probe() Hi Anand, On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:27 PM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote: [...] > @@ -353,13 +353,8 @@ static int pwm_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > drvdata->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pwm)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(drvdata->pwm); > - if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, > - "Failed to get PWM, deferring probe\n"); > - else > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get PWM: %d\n", ret); > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(drvdata->pwm), > + "Failed to get PWM\n"); > } >From functional perspective you're patch is looking good now. I just noticed that the coding-style in the pwm-regulator driver is not not use any curly brackets for the if block when there's only one statement with the curly brackets removed (and if there are no other changes to this patch) then you can add my: Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> Best regards, Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists