[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1dccp5z.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 23:37:28 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BMIPS MIPS ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] genirq: Export irq_set_affinity_locked()
On Sat, Sep 25 2021 at 23:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25 2021 at 12:48, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 18:05:38 +0100, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>>> }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_set_affinity_locked);
>>
>> This doesn't seem right.
>>
>> This driver seem to try and move interrupts on its own when the CPU
>> goes down. Why can't it rely on the normal CPU hotplug infrastructure
>> to do so like all the other drivers (bar some Cavium driver that does
>> the same thing)?
>>
>> I'd rather you take this opportunity to move these drivers into the
>> 21st century, so that we can kill irq_cpu_offline() and co altogether.
>
> I wanted to kill these callbacks years ago. Cavium has two variants of
> those offline/online callbacks:
>
> 1) octeon_irq_cpu_offline_ciu() which is doing the same as that BCM
> driver. These really can go away. Just remove the callback and
> everything just works.
For BCM this works today when that chip is used on ARM[64] simply
because the only architecture which invokes irq_cpu_offline() is MIPS.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists