linux-kernel - [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Avoid taking MRs from larger MR cache pools when a pool is empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 2021 11:31:43 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Avoid taking MRs from larger MR cache pools when a pool is empty

From: Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>

Currently, if a cache entry is empty, the driver will try to take MRs
from larger cache entries. This behavior consumes a lot of memory.
In addition, when searching for an mkey in an entry, the entry is locked.
When using a multithreaded application with the old behavior, the threads
will block each other more often, which can hurt performance as can be
seen in the table below.

Therefore, avoid it by creating a new mkey when the requested cache entry
is empty.

The test was performed on a machine with
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz 44 cores.

Here are the time measures for allocating MRs of 2^6 pages. The search in
the cache started from entry 6.

+------------+---------------------+---------------------+
|            |     Old behavior    |     New behavior    |
|            +----------+----------+----------+----------+
|            | 1 thread | 5 thread | 1 thread | 5 thread |
+============+==========+==========+==========+==========+
|  1,000 MRs |   14 ms  |   30 ms  |   14 ms  |   80 ms  |
+------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| 10,000 MRs |  135 ms  |   6 sec  |  173 ms  |  880 ms  |
+------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
|100,000 MRs | 11.2 sec |  57 sec  | 1.74 sec |  8.8 sec |
+------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+

Signed-off-by: Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
index 3be36ebbf67a..b4d2322e9ca5 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
@@ -600,29 +600,21 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mr *mlx5_mr_cache_alloc(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
 /* Return a MR already available in the cache */
 static struct mlx5_ib_mr *get_cache_mr(struct mlx5_cache_ent *req_ent)
 {
-	struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = req_ent->dev;
 	struct mlx5_ib_mr *mr = NULL;
 	struct mlx5_cache_ent *ent = req_ent;
 
-	/* Try larger MR pools from the cache to satisfy the allocation */
-	for (; ent != &dev->cache.ent[MR_CACHE_LAST_STD_ENTRY + 1]; ent++) {
-		mlx5_ib_dbg(dev, "order %u, cache index %zu\n", ent->order,
-			    ent - dev->cache.ent);
-
-		spin_lock_irq(&ent->lock);
-		if (!list_empty(&ent->head)) {
-			mr = list_first_entry(&ent->head, struct mlx5_ib_mr,
-					      list);
-			list_del(&mr->list);
-			ent->available_mrs--;
-			queue_adjust_cache_locked(ent);
-			spin_unlock_irq(&ent->lock);
-			mlx5_clear_mr(mr);
-			return mr;
-		}
+	spin_lock_irq(&ent->lock);
+	if (!list_empty(&ent->head)) {
+		mr = list_first_entry(&ent->head, struct mlx5_ib_mr, list);
+		list_del(&mr->list);
+		ent->available_mrs--;
 		queue_adjust_cache_locked(ent);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&ent->lock);
+		mlx5_clear_mr(mr);
+		return mr;
 	}
+	queue_adjust_cache_locked(ent);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ent->lock);
 	req_ent->miss++;
 	return NULL;
 }
-- 
2.31.1