[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xxvm9EznCQoQ_-YYhxhEknGTxHEnVW584ypJShT__L09eV-JOfFtr-K4M33xRa3VTL5tNgOGvJSUqWthW-El4IwTi6Vt4B_XZA-xMB6vOEY=@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 10:58:59 +0000
From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
Subject: Re: glibc VETO for kernel version SUBLEVEL >= 255
On Sunday, September 26th, 2021 at 12:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:10:53AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Recently prompted due to https://bugs.debian.org/987266 the check was
> > removed in the postinst script of libc in Debian:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987266 .
>
> Wonderful, thanks for pointing this out!
> Jari, try asking whatever distro you are getting these rebuilt packages
> from to update their scripts and all should be good.
It is/was mostly self-inflicted pain, using Rasbian distro userland and
self-compiled kernel.org kernel.
Since that problem seems to be fixed in upstream glibc, that problem is not
going to persist forever.
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
Powered by blists - more mailing lists