linux-kernel - Re: glibc VETO for kernel version SUBLEVEL >= 255

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <gjSfoj7RAJMOeVL1pzzsZl5SjMGR_BXqigZqgkJe4G_8PPfm3EhxRlrRi-I7-Z0guYL0DAFOWeSWmrt_R8RcgzNq6Bcnk7BlQ9g3_G9aT2w=@protonmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 2021 11:31:20 +0000
From:   Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
Subject: Re: glibc VETO for kernel version SUBLEVEL >= 255

On Sunday, September 26th, 2021 at 14:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Why use an older kernel tree on this device? Rasbian seems to be on
> 4.19.y at the least right now, is there something in those older kernel
> trees that you need?

Due to circumstances, I need "smallest possible" kernel with all extra
stripped out. 4.9.y kernels are smaller than newer ones.

--
Jari Ruusu  4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD  ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189