[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rnxxyl-NZoSBj8j2vUT0vtOtezAJ9BgDbgPppIcmKc1-XG-xhY72DQVkA_IPeKCfGPtxxfUvwvG5BM95aqbjXEvWxCZjHE7rT7v-L1rJ9jA=@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 16:18:58 +0000
From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@...el32.net>
Subject: Re: glibc VETO for kernel version SUBLEVEL >= 255
On Sunday, September 26th, 2021 at 14:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 11:31:20AM +0000, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> > Due to circumstances, I need "smallest possible" kernel with all extra
> > stripped out. 4.9.y kernels are smaller than newer ones.
>
> Smaller by how much, and what portion grew? Are we building things into
> the kernel that previously was able to be compiled out? Or is there
> something new added after 4.9 that adds a huge memory increase?
Byte sizes of different kernels for my laptop. Everything needed built-in,
except for wifi modules. Same compiler, roughly same kernel configs:
6906816 vmlinuz-4.9.284
7603200 vmlinuz-4.19.208
8306752 vmlinuz-5.10.69
> Figuring that out would be good as you only have 1 more year for 4.9.y
> to be alive, that's not going to last for forever...
I will deal with that when 4.9.y updates run dry, or when Raspbian
userland starts requiring newer kernel.
--
Jari Ruusu 4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189
Powered by blists - more mailing lists