linux-kernel - Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.15-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YVC4zz1vCskBMb6I@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 2021 20:15:43 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for v5.15-rc3

On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:21:18AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 3:30 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >  - Prevent undefined behaviour to the potential unaligned accesss in the
> >    instroction decoder library.
> 
> What a horrible fix that is.
> 
> This is why we have "get_unaligned()". It might use memcpy()
> internally on some architectures (it doesn't really any more - Arnd
> cleaned it all up and now it uses a pointer that is marked unaligned),
> but more importantly it explains _why_ something is done the way it's
> done, rather than be an odd memcpy().
> 
> Oh well. The memcpy works, and compilers will do the right thing for
> it, but it's ugly.
> 
> In this case, it's actually *doubly* ugly, though, because we
> literally have functions to "load unaligned data in little-endian
> format".
> 
> So instead of doing a "memcpy()", followed by a magic special macro
> that does a "switch (sizeof(t))" and does a "le*_to_cpu()" on the
> result, the code could  literally have used the functions that do this
> all for them.
> 
> Ugh. Pulled. But it's ugly.

Yeah, that came up during review:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAP-5=fU2XBoOa2=00VCuWYqsLUzMSMzUXY63ZJt9rz-NJ+vYwA@mail.gmail.com/

and the follow-on messages and AFAICT the only hurdle to using
get_unaligned() is exporting it into tools/ for use by the version of
the insn decoder there in tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c.

There's this other rather "theoretical" thing of Intel PT
decoding being done on any arch but get_unaligned() from
include/asm-generic/unaligned.h looks as generic and as arch-agnostic as
they get, to me...

But let me add the gents to Cc.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette