linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dmaengine: Introduce module option prealloc_buffer_size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 18:45:34 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>, heiko@...ech.de
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dmaengine: Introduce module option prealloc_buffer_size_kbytes

On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 18:50:46 +0800, Sugar Zhang wrote:
> Currently, The fixed 512KB prealloc buffer size is too larger for
> tiny memory kernel (such as 16MB memory). This patch adds the module
> option "prealloc_buffer_size_kbytes" to specify prealloc buffer size.
> 
> It's suitable for cards which use the generic dmaengine pcm driver
> with no config.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: dmaengine: Introduce module option prealloc_buffer_size_kbytes
      commit: b0e3b0a7078d71455747025e7deee766d4d43432

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark