[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVIFNf/xZwlrWstK@moria.home.lan>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:53:57 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Struct page proposal
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 9/23/21 03:21, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > So if we have this:
> >
> > struct page {
> > unsigned long allocator;
> > unsigned long allocatee;
> > };
> >
> > The allocator field would be used for either a pointer to slab/slub's state, if
> > it's a slab page, or if it's a buddy allocator page it'd encode the order of the
> > allocation - like compound order today, and probably whether or not the
> > (compound group of) pages is free.
>
> The "free page in buddy allocator" case will be interesting to implement.
> What the buddy allocator uses today is:
>
> - PageBuddy - determine if page is free; a page_type (part of mapcount
> field) today, could be a bit in "allocator" field that would have to be 0 in
> all other "page is allocated" contexts.
> - nid/zid - to prevent merging accross node/zone boundaries, now part of
> page flags
> - buddy order
> - a list_head (reusing the "lru") to hold the struct page on the appropriate
> free list, which has to be double-linked so page can be taken from the
> middle of the list instantly
That list_head is the problematic one. Why do we need to be able to take a page
from the middle of a freelist?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists