[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210927193915.a6yexhkgfqt23bim@kari-VirtualBox>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:39:15 +0300
From: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
joe@...ches.com
Cc: ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] fs/ntfs3: Refactoring of ntfs_set_ea
Joe's address was wrong. Just resend.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:22:36PM +0300, Kari Argillander wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 06:28:37PM +0300, Konstantin Komarov wrote:
> > Make code more readable.
> > Don't try to read zero bytes.
> > Add warning when size of exteneded attribute exceeds limit.
> > Thanks Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> for help.
>
> Usually if someone review and suggest something small do not add this
> kind of line to commit message. Also you need permission to add this. It
> us same kind of situation when we add suggested-by tag. Linux
> documentation stated that it cannot be there if we do not have
> permission from other.
>
> Also at least add that person email 'to line'. Sometimes if someone make
> huge impact to patch you can ask and add this kind of line. But then
> again it might make more sense to add it suggested or even signed off
> tag depending in situation.
>
> It can stay if Joe says it is ok.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ntfs3/xattr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> > index 1ab109723b10..5023d6f7e671 100644
> > --- a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> > +++ b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static int ntfs_read_ea(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct EA_FULL **ea,
> > size_t add_bytes, const struct EA_INFO **info)
> > {
> > int err;
> > + struct ntfs_sb_info *sbi = ni->mi.sbi;
> > struct ATTR_LIST_ENTRY *le = NULL;
> > struct ATTRIB *attr_info, *attr_ea;
> > void *ea_p;
> > @@ -99,10 +100,10 @@ static int ntfs_read_ea(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct EA_FULL **ea,
> >
> > /* Check Ea limit. */
> > size = le32_to_cpu((*info)->size);
> > - if (size > ni->mi.sbi->ea_max_size)
> > + if (size > sbi->ea_max_size)
> > return -EFBIG;
> >
> > - if (attr_size(attr_ea) > ni->mi.sbi->ea_max_size)
> > + if (attr_size(attr_ea) > sbi->ea_max_size)
> > return -EFBIG;
> >
> > /* Allocate memory for packed Ea. */
> > @@ -110,15 +111,16 @@ static int ntfs_read_ea(struct ntfs_inode *ni, struct EA_FULL **ea,
> > if (!ea_p)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - if (attr_ea->non_res) {
> > + if (!size) {
> > + ;
> > + } else if (attr_ea->non_res) {
> > struct runs_tree run;
> >
> > run_init(&run);
> >
> > err = attr_load_runs(attr_ea, ni, &run, NULL);
> > if (!err)
> > - err = ntfs_read_run_nb(ni->mi.sbi, &run, 0, ea_p, size,
> > - NULL);
> > + err = ntfs_read_run_nb(sbi, &run, 0, ea_p, size, NULL);
> > run_close(&run);
> >
> > if (err)
> > @@ -366,21 +368,22 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_ea(struct inode *inode, const char *name,
> > new_ea->name[name_len] = 0;
> > memcpy(new_ea->name + name_len + 1, value, val_size);
> > new_pack = le16_to_cpu(ea_info.size_pack) + packed_ea_size(new_ea);
> > -
> > - /* Should fit into 16 bits. */
> > - if (new_pack > 0xffff) {
> > - err = -EFBIG; // -EINVAL?
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > ea_info.size_pack = cpu_to_le16(new_pack);
> > -
> > /* New size of ATTR_EA. */
> > size += add;
> > - if (size > sbi->ea_max_size) {
> > + ea_info.size = cpu_to_le32(size);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * 1. Check ea_info.size_pack for overflow.
> > + * 2. New attibute size must fit value from $AttrDef
> > + */
> > + if (new_pack > 0xffff || size > sbi->ea_max_size) {
> > + ntfs_inode_warn(
> > + inode,
> > + "The size of extended attributes must not exceed 64KiB");
> > err = -EFBIG; // -EINVAL?
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - ea_info.size = cpu_to_le32(size);
> >
> > update_ea:
> >
> > --
> > 2.33.0
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists