[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0_RBc6dCzzGcxzC=g5ODDia-9nQcKROWSPm4jVAJgEnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:37:20 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@...il.com>,
Amarjargal Gundjalam <amarjargal16@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: shut up out-of-range warning
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:22 PM Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com> wrote:
> On 27/09/2021 13:26, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 01:36:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>
> >> - if (num_pages > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct pagelist) -
> >> + if ((size_t)num_pages > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct pagelist) -
> >> sizeof(struct vchiq_pagelist_info)) /
> >> (sizeof(u32) + sizeof(pages[0]) +
> >> sizeof(struct scatterlist)))
> >
> > The temptation would be to declare "num_pages" as size_t instead of
> > adding this cost. But then something will complain about the
> > "pagelistinfo->num_pages = num_pages;" assignment because
> > "pagelistinfo->num_pages" is a u32.
> >
> > The next temptation is to change the SIZE_MAX to UINT_MAX. I didn't
> > do that originally because I can't test this and I was trying not to
> > break things... We probably still don't want to break things, but maybe
> > there is someone who is more familiar with this who knows if UINT_MAX is
> > okay?
>
> The VPU can't address more than 1GB directly, so UINT_MAX is more than sufficient.
Is there a macro that already defines that 1GB size, or maybe an even smaller
value that makes sense as an upper bound?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists