[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVJAIlGr5EvepsOg@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:05:22 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa <skoralah@....com>
Cc: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, yazen.ghannam@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/mce/inject: Check if a bank is unpopulated
before error simulation
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:56:17PM -0500, Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa wrote:
> Yes, this makes sense to me now. But you meant to say inj_ipid_set()
> instead of inj_bank_set()..?
Yeah, I had it correct before:
"This whole thing belongs into inj_ipid_set() where you should verify... "
>
> Something like this:
>
> -MCE_INJECT_SET(ipid)
>
> +static int inj_ipid_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + struct mce *m = (struct mce*)data;
>
> + if cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMCA)) {
>
> + rdmsrl_on_cpu(..
> ..
> ..
> + m->ipid = val;
> + ..
> +}
Yes, and return proper error codes.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists