linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the ipsec tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3680eb9-44d0-efe9-7037-9799a66786f7@6wind.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:55:07 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the ipsec tree

Hi Stephen,

Le 26/09/2021 à 22:49, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   93ec1320b017 ("xfrm: fix rcu lock in xfrm_notify_userpolicy()")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: 703b94b93c19 ("xfrm: notify default policy on update")
> 
> has these problem(s):
> 
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
> 
> Maybe you meant
> 
> Fixes: 88d0adb5f13b ("xfrm: notify default policy on update")
> 
In fact, the sha1 comes from the ipsec tree, which is regularly rebased.
The original patch is only in this tree for now.
Steffen, maybe this fix could be squashed with the original commit?


Regards,
Nicolas