[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVEvgfJQJ1aRerg6@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 03:42:09 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: shakeelb@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] slub: Add back check for free nonslab objects
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:15:38AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Commit ("0937502af7c9 slub: Add check for kfree() of non slab objects.")
> add the ability, which should be needed in any configs to catch the
> invalid free, they even could be potential issue, eg, memory corruption,
> use after free and double-free, so replace VM_BUG_ON_PAGE to WARN_ON, and
> add dump_page() to help use to debug the issue.
Is dump_page() really the best way to catch such a thing? I would have
thought that printing the address of 'object' would be more helpful.
> @@ -3522,7 +3522,8 @@ static inline void free_nonslab_page(struct page *page, void *object)
> {
> unsigned int order = compound_order(page);
>
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page), page);
> + if (WARN_ON(!PageCompound(page)))
> + dump_page(page, "invalid free nonslab page");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists