[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVHfMVmy8Lo0J3vR@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 08:11:45 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
minchan@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, yzaikin@...gle.com, nathan@...nel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp,
vitor@...saru.org, elver@...gle.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
glider@...gle.com, rf@...nsource.cirrus.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, David.Laight@...lab.com,
bvanassche@....org, jolsa@...nel.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, trishalfonso@...gle.com,
andreyknvl@...il.com, jikos@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.com,
ngupta@...are.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
kw@...ux.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
hch@....de, joe@...ches.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, copyleft-next@...ts.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12 (RESEND)] syfs: generic deadlock fix with module
removal
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 07:55:13AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:04:18PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > In this v7 I've decided it is best to merge all the effort together into
> > one patch set because communication was being lost when I split the
> > patches up. This was not helping in any way to either fix the zram
> > issues or come to consensus on a generic solution. The patches are also
> > merged now because they are all related now.
>
> Building up all the testing framewoork is really great. I have no opinions
> about the license related stuff but all other changes generally look good to
> me.
OK I am going to send a v8 shortly with the changes from folks addressed.
I'm going to trim the Cc list considerbly for that v8 as the list is already
quite large and I think it may appear as spam to some lists, I'll drop the
copyleft-next folks as hopefully the license stuff is out of the way.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists