linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 10/16] staging: r8188eu: shorten and simplify calls chains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YVHlRf7C6m+2Si+3@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:37:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Laight <david.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/16] staging: r8188eu: shorten and simplify calls
 chains

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 02:37:52PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> On Friday, September 24, 2021 2:26:49 PM CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > --- Preface ---
> > 
> > This is v10 of "shorten and simplify calls chain". The 14 (v7) + 2 (v8) 
> > patches have already been applied to staging-testing, so we have been 
> > requested to reset the numbering of the remaining patches to 01/16, while 
> > discarding from v9 the above-mentioned 16 patches (otherwise we would
> > have submitted a series containing 32 patches, that is 1 patch less than
> > v8 because it has been dropped by us in what we considered it
> > unnecessary - it was about fixing a misspelled word in a comment).
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Please disregard this weird cover. I don't know how I've been able to make 
> the mess you see in the subject. The good one has been sent soon after this.
> And please, let me know if it is necessary to resend in order to have the 
> cover letter as the first email of the thread.

Nah, I can figure it out, looks good, let's queue it up and see what
breaks :)

thanks,

greg k-h