[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a4c7e3d-5823-6b19-3fd8-e4accf53f28f@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 18:21:29 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] nSVM: use svm->nested.save to load vmcb12
registers and avoid TOC/TOU races
On 14/09/21 11:12, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> But actually that you mention it, I'll say why not to create vmcb_control_area_cached
> as well indeed and change the type of svm->nested.save to it. (in a separate patch)
I think you should have two structs, struct vmcb12_control_area_cache
and struct vmcb12_save_area_cache. Otherwise the two series that
Emanuele posted are nice and can be combined into just one.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists