linux-kernel - Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Mark cache dirty before entering sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8d2f176-df63-f81b-e47a-73b1c436b612@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:15:31 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Ryan Lee <RyanS.Lee@...imintegrated.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com" 
        <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "ryan.lee.maxim@...il.com" <ryan.lee.maxim@...il.com>,
        "tiwai@...e.com" <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sathya.prakash.m.r@...el.com" <sathya.prakash.m.r@...el.com>,
        "yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com" <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: Mark cache dirty before
 entering sleep




>>>> Instead of changing the suspend sequence, can we please try to modify
>>>> the max98373_io_init() routine to unconditionally flag the cache as
>>>> dirty, maybe this points to a problem with the management of the
>>>> max98373->first_hw_init flag.
>>>
>>> A quick survey of other drivers suggests that this pattern should be
>>> factored out into some helpers as it looks like there's several ways
>>> of implementing it that look very similar but not quite the same...
>>
>> No disagreement here, we tried really hard to enforce a common pattern for
>> suspend-resume, but i just noticed that the maxim amp driver is different on
>> suspend (resume is consistent with the rest).
> 
> OK. I believe it was similar before. But it looks like 'regcache_mark_dirty' is being
> disappeared on suspend function.

Not sure what you are trying to say?

> static int __maybe_unused rt5682_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> 	struct rt5682_priv *rt5682 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> 
> 	if (!rt5682->hw_init)
> 		return 0;
> 
> 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rt5682->jack_detect_work);
> 
> 	regcache_cache_only(rt5682->regmap, true);
> 	regcache_mark_dirty(rt5682->regmap);
> 
> 	return 0;
> }

That last line is also not needed. If you look at rt5682-sdw.c, you'll
see a regcache_mark_dirty() when the device is re-initialized.

But now I am starting to wonder if this is due to Chrome kernel
differences and possibly a missing backport patch? I no longer believe
in coincidences, these two devices are ONLY used in Chromebooks so far...