lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:23:47 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     kbuild@...ts.01.org, Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     lkp@...el.com, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c:646 prepare_shadow_wa_ctx()
 warn: inconsistent returns 'wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj->base.resv'.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   92477dd1faa650e50bd3bb35a6c0b8d09198cc35
commit: 67f1120381df022a7016f4acc8d4880da9a66c03 drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.
config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210927 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

New smatch warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c:646 prepare_shadow_wa_ctx() warn: inconsistent returns 'wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj->base.resv'.

vim +646 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c

d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  605  static int prepare_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx)
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  606  {
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  607  	struct i915_vma *vma;
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  608  	unsigned char *per_ctx_va =
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  609  		(unsigned char *)wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.shadow_va +
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  610  		wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size;
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  611  	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  612  	int ret;
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  613  
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  614  	if (wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size == 0)
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  615  		return 0;
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  616  
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  617  	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, false);
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  618  retry:
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  619  	i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, &ww);
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  620  
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  621  	vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, &ww, NULL,
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  622  					  0, CACHELINE_BYTES, 0);
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  623  	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  624  		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  625  		if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  626  			ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  627  			if (!ret)
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  628  				goto retry;

Does this path result in a double lock?  (I haven't looked carefully).

67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  629  		}
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  630  		return ret;

Call i915_gem_object_unlock() before returning.

67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  631  	}
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  632  
67f1120381df02 Zhi Wang 2021-01-10  633  	i915_gem_object_unlock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj);
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  634  
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  635  	/* FIXME: we are not tracking our pinned VMA leaving it
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  636  	 * up to the core to fix up the stray pin_count upon
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  637  	 * free.
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  638  	 */
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  639  
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  640  	wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.shadow_gma = i915_ggtt_offset(vma);
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  641  
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  642  	wa_ctx->per_ctx.shadow_gma = *((unsigned int *)per_ctx_va + 1);
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  643  	memset(per_ctx_va, 0, CACHELINE_BYTES);
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  644  
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  645  	update_wa_ctx_2_shadow_ctx(wa_ctx);
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12 @646  	return 0;
d8235b5e55845d Zhi Wang 2017-09-12  647  }

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ