[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVMAgFpGvKgBfx0P@8bytes.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:46:08 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
VMware Inc <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/11] x86/tdx: Add protected guest support for TDX
guest
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:28:05AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> static inline bool prot_guest_has(unsigned int attr)
> {
> if (sme_me_mask)
> return amd_prot_guest_has(attr);
> + else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> + return intel_prot_guest_has(attr);
This causes a function call on every Intel machine this code runs. is
there an easier to check whether TDX is enabled, like the sme_me_mask
check on AMD?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists