[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <X1850R.K87ZAZR7ALEU2@ljones.dev>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 01:01:09 +1300
From: Luke Jones <luke@...nes.dev>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pobrn@...tonmail.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] asus-wmi: Add support for custom fan curves
On Tue, Sep 28 2021 at 13:59:31 +0200, Hans de Goede
<hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/28/21 1:56 PM, Luke Jones wrote:
>> Hmm,
>> A change via /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile does disable the
>> fan-curve until a user re-enables it.
>
> Ah ok, so did get that part right :)
>
> So basically any write to /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile
> will reset the pwm1_enable to "2" if it was not "2" already.
>
>> It doesn't wipe the actual curve setting though, I thought that
>> would be bad UX,
>
> Ok that is fine.
>
>> but yes the curve is definitely disabled on profile change and will
>> remain disabled until turned on again. At which point another
>> profile change will disable it again.
>>
>> And as stated in previous reply use of
>> /sys/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/hwmon/hwmon<N>/pwm<N>_enable to
>> check the status is stabilised (1 = manual fan).
>>
>> Looking at it with fresh eyes I just spotted some things I can
>> clean up further. Very sorry, there'll be a v15 :(
>
> No worries, maybe wait a bit with posting v15 till Bastien has a
> chance
> to way in on this discussion though.
No problem at all. Very little will change except for code clean up :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 28 2021 at 13:44:32 +0200, Hans de Goede
>> <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 9/28/21 1:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 11:22 +1200, Luke D. Jones wrote:
>>>>> Add support for custom fan curves found on some ASUS ROG
>>>>> laptops.
>>>>>
>>>>> These laptops have the ability to set a custom curve for the CPU
>>>>> and GPU fans via two ACPI methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds two pwm<N> attributes to the hwmon sysfs,
>>>>> pwm1 for CPU fan, pwm2 for GPU fan. Both are under the hwmon of
>>>>> the
>>>>> name `asus_custom_fan_curve`. There is no safety check of the
>>>>> set
>>>>> fan curves - this must be done in userspace.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fans have settings [1,2,3] under pwm<N>_enable:
>>>>> 1. Enable and write settings out
>>>>> 2. Disable and use factory fan mode
>>>>> 3. Same as 2, additionally restoring default factory curve.
>>>>>
>>>>> Use of 2 means that the curve the user has set is still stored
>>>>> and
>>>>> won't be erased, but the laptop will be using its default
>>>>> auto-fan
>>>>> mode. Re-enabling the manual mode then activates the curves
>>>>> again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Notes:
>>>>> - pwm<N>_enable = 0 is an invalid setting.
>>>>> - pwm is actually a percentage and is scaled on writing to
>>>>> device.
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to update:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/hadess/power-profiles-daemon/-/merge_requests/80
>>>> but I don't understand what files I need to check for what
>>>> values to
>>>> detect whether custom fan curves were used.
>>>>
>>>> Can you help me out here?
>>>
>>> How to deal with this is actually one of my remaining questions
>>> too.
>>>
>>> I've not looked at the new code closely yet, but if I understand
>>> things correctly, the now code basically only allows to set 1
>>> custom profile and setting that profile overrides the last
>>> profile set through /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile.
>>>
>>> And any write to /sys/firmware/acpi/platform_profile will
>>> overwrite / replace the last custom set profile (if any) with
>>> the one matching the requested platform-profile.
>>>
>>> So basically users of custom fan profiles are expected to
>>> disable power-profiles-daemon or at least to refrain from
>>> making any platform_profile changes.
>>>
>>> And if power-profile-daemon is actually active and
>>> makes a change then any custom settings will be thrown away,
>>> IOW p-p-d will always win. So I believe that it no longer needs
>>> to check for custom profiles, since any time it requests a
>>> standard profile that will overwrite any custom profile
>>> which may be present.
>>>
>>> Luke, do I have that right ?
>>>
>>>> Also, was this patch accepted in the pdx86 tree?
>>>
>>> No, I still need to find/make some time to review it and
>>> I still have the same question as you :)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists