linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] block: 5th batch of add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bfd9f85a-d6fb-c05a-5ec3-2e15ee08062d@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:28:11 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        chaitanya.kulkarni@....com, atulgopinathan@...il.com, hare@...e.de,
        maximlevitsky@...il.com, oakad@...oo.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        colin.king@...onical.com, shubhankarvk@...il.com,
        baijiaju1990@...il.com, trix@...hat.com,
        dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] block: 5th batch of add_disk() error handling
 conversions

On 9/28/21 2:44 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:32:17PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 9/27/21 4:02 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>> This is the 5th series of driver conversions for add_disk() error
>>> handling. This set along with the entire 7th set of patches can be
>>> found on my 20210927-for-axboe-add-disk-error-handling branch [0].
>>
>> Applied 1-2.
> 
> Hmm.. naturally I would have expected that the dasd patch also would
> go via block tree. But let's not spend too much time figuring out what
> gets routed where.
> Applied 4-6. Thanks!

I left the ones that have active maintainers for them to pick. Unless
someone has already acked/reviwed it, in which case I picked it up.
I've got no problems picking them up directly, but unless it's been
reviewed by the maintainer, I prefer if they either do so or pick
them up.

-- 
Jens Axboe