[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210929233624.GG3544071@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:36:24 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jakowski Andrzej <andrzej.jakowski@...el.com>,
Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@...el.com>,
Jason Ekstrand <jason@...kstrand.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@...eticom.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Userspace P2PDMA with O_DIRECT NVMe devices
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:28:38PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-09-29 5:21 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:50:02PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021-09-28 2:02 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 05:40:40PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> This patchset continues my work to add userspace P2PDMA access using
> >>>> O_DIRECT NVMe devices. My last posting[1] just included the first 13
> >>>> patches in this series, but the early P2PDMA cleanup and map_sg error
> >>>> changes from that series have been merged into v5.15-rc1. To address
> >>>> concerns that that series did not add any new functionality, I've added
> >>>> back the userspcae functionality from the original RFC[2] (but improved
> >>>> based on the original feedback).
> >>>
> >>> I really think this is the best series yet, it really looks nice
> >>> overall. I know the sg flag was a bit of a debate at the start, but it
> >>> serves an undeniable purpose and the resulting standard DMA APIs 'just
> >>> working' is really clean.
> >>
> >> Actually, so far, nobody has said anything negative about using the SG flag.
> >>
> >>> There is more possible here, we could also pass the new GUP flag in the
> >>> ib_umem code..
> >>
> >> Yes, that would be very useful.
> >
> > You might actually prefer to do that then the bio changes to get the
> > infrastructur merged as it seems less "core"
>
> I'm a little bit more concerned about my patch set growing too large.
> It's already at 20 patches and I think I'll need to add a couple more
> based on the feedback you've already provided. So I'm leaning toward
> pushing more functionality as future work.
I mean you could postpone the three block related patches and use a
single ib_umem patch instead as the consumer.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists