[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871r576eqe.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:08:25 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"parav@...lanox.com" <parav@...lanox.com>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"lushenming@...wei.com" <lushenming@...wei.com>,
"eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"nicolinc@...dia.com" <nicolinc@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 03/20] vfio: Add vfio_[un]register_device()
On Wed, Sep 29 2021, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com> wrote:
>> From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 10:44 AM
>>
>> > One alternative option is to arrange device nodes in sub-directories based
>> > on the device type. But doing so also adds one trouble to userspace. The
>> > current vfio uAPI is designed to have the user query device type via
>> > VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO after opening the device. With this option the user
>> > instead needs to figure out the device type before opening the device, to
>> > identify the sub-directory.
>>
>> Wouldn't this be up to the operator / configuration, rather than the
>> actual software though? I would assume that typically the VFIO
>> program would be pointed at a specific vfio device node file to use,
>> e.g.
>> my-vfio-prog -d /dev/vfio/pci/0000:0a:03.1
>>
>> Or more generally, if you're expecting userspace to know a name in a
>> uniqu pattern, they can equally well know a "type/name" pair.
>>
>
> You are correct. Currently:
>
> -device, vfio-pci,host=DDDD:BB:DD.F
> -device, vfio-pci,sysfdev=/sys/bus/pci/devices/ DDDD:BB:DD.F
> -device, vfio-platform,sysdev=/sys/bus/platform/devices/PNP0103:00
>
> above is definitely type/name information to find the related node.
>
> Actually even for Jason's proposal we still need such information to
> identify the sysfs path.
>
> Then I feel type-based sub-directory does work. Adding another link
> to sysfs sounds unnecessary now. But I'm not sure whether we still
> want to create /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0 thing and related udev rule
> thing that you pointed out in another mail.
Still reading through this whole thread, but type-based subdirectories
also make the most sense to me. I don't really see userspace wanting to
grab just any device and then figure out whether it is the device it was
looking for, but rather immediately go to a specific device or at least
a device of a specific type.
Sequentially-numbered devices tend to become really unwieldy in my
experience if you are working on a system with loads of devices.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists