linux-kernel - Re: Re：[PATCH v2] scripts/decodecode: fix faulting instruction no print when opps.file is DOS format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YVQ1cSttGChXIZ5J@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:44:17 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     韦东辉 <weidonghui@...winnertech.com>
Cc:     akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, maz <maz@...terjones.org>,
        will <will@...nel.org>, rabin <rabin@....in>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re：[PATCH v2] scripts/decodecode: fix faulting instruction no
 print when opps.file is DOS format

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:37:07AM +0800, 韦东辉 wrote:
> HI，all Thank you Borislav Petkov for helping me add the CC email
> list. I don't quite understand the meaning of this Google link

（ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12167178/replace-windows-newlines-in-a-lot-of-files-using-sed-but-it-doesnt）.

> This means that decodecode does not need to process CR(^M)? Must
> ensure that there is no CR(^M) when inputting log? If so, it will
> increase the cost of learning for others. And I think adding tr -d
> "\\015" will not destroy the beauty of the code, but enhance the
> compatibility of decodecode.

You don't need to use a different tool, tr in this case, to remove the
^M character - sed can do that just fine. And that link has the answer
how, I'll let you figure it out.

Also, please do not top-post when replying but put your reply *under*
the text you're replying to, just like I did.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg