[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB2848FE480F24EF105E473F4EE1A99@SN6PR11MB2848.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:08:06 +0000
From: <Don.Brace@...rochip.com>
To: <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
CC: <Kevin.Barnett@...rochip.com>, <Scott.Teel@...rochip.com>,
<Justin.Lindley@...rochip.com>, <Scott.Benesh@...rochip.com>,
<Gerry.Morong@...rochip.com>, <Mahesh.Rajashekhara@...rochip.com>,
<Mike.McGowen@...rochip.com>, <Murthy.Bhat@...rochip.com>,
<Balsundar.P@...rochip.com>, <joseph.szczypek@....com>,
<jeff@...onical.com>, <POSWALD@...e.com>,
<john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>, <mwilck@...e.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [smartpqi updates PATCH V2 00/11] smartpqi updates
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Menzel [mailto:pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de]
Subject: Re: [smartpqi updates PATCH V2 00/11] smartpqi updates
Dear Don,
Just a small nit regarding most patches in the patch queue.
It’d be great if the full text width of 75 characters could be used in the commit message bodies. Currently they are well below that, and therefore take more lines than necessary and are harder to read for me.
Kind regards,
Paul
---
I can re-word and re-send if you like.
Thanks,
Don Brace
Powered by blists - more mailing lists