[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <VM970R.TLCBMNA67DOI2@crapouillou.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:30:31 +0100
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Paul Boddie <paul@...die.org.uk>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] drm/ingenic: Add support for JZ4780 and HDMI
output
Hi,
Le mar., sept. 28 2021 at 14:06:03 +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@...delico.com> a écrit :
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Am 28.09.2021 um 12:21 schrieb H. Nikolaus Schaller
>> <hns@...delico.com>:
>>
>>>> @@ -1492,10 +1555,16 @@ static int ingenic_drm_init(void)
>>>> {
>>>> int err;
>>>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_INGENIC_DW_HDMI)) {
>>>> + err = platform_driver_register(ingenic_dw_hdmi_driver_ptr);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> I don't see why you need to register the ingenic-dw-hdmi driver
>>> here. Just register it in the ingenic-dw-hdmi driver.
>>
>> Ok, I never though about this (as the code was not from me). We
>> apparently just followed the IPU code pattern (learning by example).
>>
>> It indeed looks not necessary and would also avoid the
>> ingenic_dw_hdmi_driver_ptr dependency.
>>
>> But: what is ingenic_ipu_driver_ptr then good for?
>>
It's done this way because ingenic-drm-drv.c and ingenic-ipu.c are both
compiled within the same module ingenic-drm.
I'm not sure this is still required, maybe ingenic-ipu.c can be its own
module now.
>>
>> If we can get rid of this as well, we can drop patch 1/10
>> ("drm/ingenic: Fix drm_init error path if IPU was registered")
>> completely.
>
> A quick test shows that it *is* required. At least if I configure
> everything as modules.
> But like you I can't explain why.
Well, a quick test here shows that it is not required, at least when
configuring with everything built-in.
-Paul
> Well, just a very rough idea (may be wrong): the bridge chain is not
> like an i2c bus and
> clients are not automatically loaded/probed if linked in the device
> tree. Therefore the
> consumer (ingenic_drm_drv) must register the "clients" like IPU and
> HDMI.
>
> BR,
> Nikolaus
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists