[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210929162428.GG22029@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:24:28 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to
verify kernel image signature
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 08:50:04AM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> From: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
>
> This allows to verify arm64 kernel image signature using not only
> .builtin_trusted_keys but also .secondary_trusted_keys and .platform keyring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> index 9ec34690e255..2357ee2f229a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> #include <linux/pe.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> -#include <linux/verification.h>
> #include <asm/byteorder.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/image.h>
> @@ -133,8 +132,7 @@ static void *image_load(struct kimage *image,
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_IMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
> static int image_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
> {
> - return verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len, NULL,
> - VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> + return arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(kernel, kernel_len);
I'm fine with this in principle, but it looks like the first patch is the
important one.
So for the arm64 bit:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists