[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a2ada00-fe4f-284c-46a5-c0f6676bcfe1@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 20:58:15 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use direction definition DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
instead of PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
Le 30/09/2021 à 16:21, Daniel Vetter a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 08:46:12PM +0800, Cai Huoqing wrote:
>> Replace direction definition PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
>> with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, because it helps to enhance readability
>> and avoid possible inconsistency.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
>
> Applied to drm-intel-gt-next, thanks for the patch.
> -Daniel
Hi,
just in case, a similar patch received some (unrelated) comments a few
weeks ago. See [1].
Should it rings some bells to someone who know who knows what should be
done.
Just my 2c.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/0cd61d5b-ac88-31e8-99ad-143af480416f@arm.com/
CJ
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++--
>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
>> index a74b72f50cc9..afb35d2e5c73 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_region_lmem.c
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int init_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
>> mem->remap_addr = dma_map_resource(i915->drm.dev,
>> mem->region.start,
>> mem->fake_mappable.size,
>> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(i915->drm.dev, mem->remap_addr)) {
>> drm_mm_remove_node(&mem->fake_mappable);
>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void release_fake_lmem_bar(struct intel_memory_region *mem)
>> dma_unmap_resource(mem->i915->drm.dev,
>> mem->remap_addr,
>> mem->fake_mappable.size,
>> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
>> index e5c2fdfc20e3..53d0cb327539 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c
>> @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static void ppgtt_free_spt(struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *spt)
>> trace_spt_free(spt->vgpu->id, spt, spt->guest_page.type);
>>
>> dma_unmap_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.mfn << I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT, 4096,
>> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>>
>> radix_tree_delete(&spt->vgpu->gtt.spt_tree, spt->shadow_page.mfn);
>>
>> @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
>> */
>> spt->shadow_page.type = type;
>> daddr = dma_map_page(kdev, spt->shadow_page.page,
>> - 0, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(kdev, daddr)) {
>> gvt_vgpu_err("fail to map dma addr\n");
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static struct intel_vgpu_ppgtt_spt *ppgtt_alloc_spt(
>> return spt;
>>
>> err_unmap_dma:
>> - dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + dma_unmap_page(kdev, daddr, PAGE_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> err_free_spt:
>> free_spt(spt);
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> @@ -2409,8 +2409,7 @@ static int alloc_scratch_pages(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> - daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0,
>> - 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(scratch_pt), 0, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
>> gvt_vgpu_err("fail to dmamap scratch_pt\n");
>> __free_page(virt_to_page(scratch_pt));
>> @@ -2461,7 +2460,7 @@ static int release_scratch_page_tree(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
>> if (vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page != NULL) {
>> daddr = (dma_addr_t)(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn <<
>> I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
>> - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> __free_page(vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page);
>> vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page = NULL;
>> vgpu->gtt.scratch_pt[i].page_mfn = 0;
>> @@ -2741,7 +2740,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
>> }
>>
>> daddr = dma_map_page(dev, virt_to_page(page), 0,
>> - 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(dev, daddr)) {
>> gvt_err("fail to dmamap scratch ggtt page\n");
>> __free_page(virt_to_page(page));
>> @@ -2755,7 +2754,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
>> ret = setup_spt_oos(gvt);
>> if (ret) {
>> gvt_err("fail to initialize SPT oos\n");
>> - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> __free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -2779,7 +2778,7 @@ void intel_gvt_clean_gtt(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
>> dma_addr_t daddr = (dma_addr_t)(gvt->gtt.scratch_mfn <<
>> I915_GTT_PAGE_SHIFT);
>>
>> - dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + dma_unmap_page(dev, daddr, 4096, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>>
>> __free_page(gvt->gtt.scratch_page);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
>> index 7efa386449d1..20b82fb036f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
>> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int gvt_dma_map_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
>> return ret;
>>
>> /* Setup DMA mapping. */
>> - *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + *dma_addr = dma_map_page(dev, page, 0, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> if (dma_mapping_error(dev, *dma_addr)) {
>> gvt_vgpu_err("DMA mapping failed for pfn 0x%lx, ret %d\n",
>> page_to_pfn(page), ret);
>> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void gvt_dma_unmap_page(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, unsigned long gfn,
>> {
>> struct device *dev = vgpu->gvt->gt->i915->drm.dev;
>>
>> - dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + dma_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> gvt_unpin_guest_page(vgpu, gfn, size);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> index 36489be4896b..cd5f2348a187 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int i915_gem_gtt_prepare_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> do {
>> if (dma_map_sg_attrs(obj->base.dev->dev,
>> pages->sgl, pages->nents,
>> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL,
>> DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC |
>> DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING |
>> DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN))
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ void i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> usleep_range(100, 250);
>>
>> dma_unmap_sg(i915->drm.dev, pages->sgl, pages->nents,
>> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists