lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:31:19 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: show list of valid --arch options when invalid

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:23 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 7:26 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Consider this attempt to run KUnit in QEMU:
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86
> >
> > Before you'd get this error message:
> > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch
> >
> > After:
> > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: x86 is not a valid arch, options are ['alpha', 'arm', 'arm64', 'i386', 'powerpc', 'riscv', 's390', 'sparc', 'x86_64']
> >
> > This should make it a bit easier for people to notice when they make
> > typos, etc. Currently, one would have to dive into the python code to
> > figure out what the valid set is.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> > ---
>
> This is really nice, particularly given that we've had to reproduce
> that list in lots of talks, documentation, etc. and it could get
> out-of-date.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
>
> [FYI: this didn't seem to apply cleanly to kselftest/kunit head, but
> it was a pretty minor issue with kunit_tool_test.py.]

Oh, this is on top of
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210928221111.1162779-1-dlatypov@google.com/

I guess this line there
- tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
+ kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
 tripped things up a bit.

>
> Thanks,
> -- David
>
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py    | 5 +++--
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > index 1870e75ff153..a6b3cee3f0d0 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py
> > @@ -198,8 +198,9 @@ def get_source_tree_ops(arch: str, cross_compile: Optional[str]) -> LinuxSourceT
> >                 return LinuxSourceTreeOperationsUml(cross_compile=cross_compile)
> >         elif os.path.isfile(config_path):
> >                 return get_source_tree_ops_from_qemu_config(config_path, cross_compile)[1]
> > -       else:
> > -               raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch')
> > +
> > +       options = [f[:-3] for f in os.listdir(QEMU_CONFIGS_DIR) if f.endswith('.py')]
> > +       raise ConfigError(arch + ' is not a valid arch, options are ' + str(sorted(options)))
> >
> >  def get_source_tree_ops_from_qemu_config(config_path: str,
> >                                          cross_compile: Optional[str]) -> Tuple[
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > index cad37a98e599..2ae72f04cbe0 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> > @@ -289,6 +289,10 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase):
> >                                 pass
> >                         kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir)
> >
> > +       def test_invalid_arch(self):
> > +               with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'not a valid arch, options are.*x86_64'):
> > +                       kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', arch='invalid')
> > +
> >         # TODO: add more test cases.
> >
> >
> >
> > base-commit: 865a0a8025ee0b54d1cc74834c57197d184a441e
> > --
> > 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists