[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVVT8su0iYNXz5fn@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:06:42 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc: jbaron@...mai.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dyndbg: recode for stronger precondition
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:37:30PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> The table of struct _ddebugs, due to its construction by the linker,
> has an important property; namely that its "equal" fields have actual
> ptr-equality, not just strcmp-equality. Lets recognize that truth in
> dynamic_debug_init(), while slicing the builtin table into a
> per-module list.
> ---
> lib/dynamic_debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> index cb5abb42c16a..817a87e9c37f 100644
> --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static int __init dynamic_debug_init(void)
> iter_start = iter;
> for (; iter < __stop___dyndbg; iter++) {
> entries++;
> - if (strcmp(modname, iter->modname)) {
> + if (modname != iter->modname) {
> modct++;
> ret = ddebug_add_module(iter_start, n, modname);
> if (ret)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Always run checkpatch on a patch so you do not get a grumpy kernel
developer telling you to run checkpatch on your patch :(
I can't take this for the obvious reasons here...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists