| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:29:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Anand K Mistry <amistry@...gle.com>,
"Kenta.Tada@...y.com" <Kenta.Tada@...y.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Michael Weiß
<michael.weiss@...ec.fraunhofer.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@...sung.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task
blocked
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:28:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:27:07AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:02:14PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > Having a stable wchan means the process must be blocked and for it to
> > > stay that way while performing stack unwinding.
> >
> > How's this instead?
> >
> On top of which we can do..
But that then leads to..
---
Subject: arch: Fix STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Thu Sep 30 10:21:15 CEST 2021
A few archs got save_stack_trace_tsk() vs in_sched_functions() wrong.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/csky/kernel/stacktrace.c | 7 ++++++-
arch/mips/kernel/stacktrace.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/nds32/kernel/stacktrace.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -132,12 +132,17 @@ static bool save_trace(unsigned long pc,
return __save_trace(pc, arg, false);
}
+static bool save_trace_nosched(unsigned long pc, void *arg)
+{
+ return __save_trace(pc, arg, true);
+}
+
/*
* Save stack-backtrace addresses into a stack_trace buffer.
*/
void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
{
- walk_stackframe(tsk, NULL, save_trace, trace);
+ walk_stackframe(tsk, NULL, save_trace_nosched, trace);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -66,16 +66,7 @@ static void save_context_stack(struct st
#endif
}
-/*
- * Save stack-backtrace addresses into a stack_trace buffer.
- */
-void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
- save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
-
-void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+void __save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace, bool savesched)
{
struct pt_regs dummyregs;
struct pt_regs *regs = &dummyregs;
@@ -88,6 +79,20 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
regs->cp0_epc = tsk->thread.reg31;
} else
prepare_frametrace(regs);
- save_context_stack(trace, tsk, regs, tsk == current);
+ save_context_stack(trace, tsk, regs, savesched);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Save stack-backtrace addresses into a stack_trace buffer.
+ */
+void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ __save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
+
+void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ __save_stack_trace_tsk(tsk, trace, false);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
--- a/arch/nds32/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/nds32/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -6,13 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
-void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
- save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
-
-void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+static void __save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace, bool savesched)
{
unsigned long *fpn;
int skip = trace->skip;
@@ -21,10 +15,8 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
if (tsk == current) {
__asm__ __volatile__("\tori\t%0, $fp, #0\n":"=r"(fpn));
- savesched = 1;
} else {
fpn = (unsigned long *)thread_saved_fp(tsk);
- savesched = 0;
}
while (!kstack_end(fpn) && !((unsigned long)fpn & 0x3)
@@ -50,4 +42,14 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_st
fpn = (unsigned long *)fpp;
}
}
+void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ __save_stack_trace_tsk(current, trace, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
+
+void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ __save_stack_trace_tsk(tsk, trace, false);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists