[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVWu2RoSqEzcG79I@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:34:33 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select
configs
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > It sounds like a lack of testing is your main concern.
> >
> > How can I help here? What H/W do I need to be able to fully test this?
>
> The changes here need to be tested on affected platforms (ARMv7 and
> ARMv8), when built as a modules on some types of regular distros (e.g.
> Arch, Ubuntu). From each of such boot I would be happy to see number of
> new dmesg warnings/errors plus number of probe deferrals.
>
> Since the drivers could be switched to modules (and some distros might
> do it), they might be hit by surprise regressions in boot performance
> due to probe deferrals. This should be also checked on these platforms.
> Geert pointed out before that clocks in many cases are not optional -
> driver needs them and will wait defer.
>
> Assuming of course that boot succeeds. Minor differences in boot speed
> should not be a problem, I think, because distro anyway chosen
> all-module approach so it accepts the penalty.
Do you have any suggestions in terms of devboards?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists