[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVW1XKJcKpuOxAaf@osiris>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:02:20 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] s390: add CPU field to struct thread_info
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:58:09PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to s390's definition of
> struct thread_info.
>
> Note that s390 always has CONFIG_SMP=y so there is no point in guarding
> the CPU field with an #ifdef.
>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists