| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_-bU-zuNE6-omHV=54R5UDOH2KQ0iD_ZcLc-VDeA65vTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:11:01 +0800
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
Cc: "jason-jh.lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, fshao@...omium.org,
"Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>, singo.chang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/3] drm/mediatek: Fix crash at using pkt->cl->chan in cmdq_pkt_finalize
Hi, Enric:
Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com> 於 2021年9月30日 週四 下午3:12寫道：
>
> Hi Jason,
>
>
> Missatge de jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com> del dia dj., 30
> de set. 2021 a les 4:47:
> >
> > Because mtk_drm_crtc_create_pkt didn't assign pkt->cl, it will
> > crash at using pkt->cl->chan in cmdq_pkt_finalize.
> >
> > So add struct cmdq_client and let mtk_drm_crtc instance define
> > cmdq_client as:
> >
> > struct mtk_drm_crtc {
> > /* client instance data */
> > struct cmdq_client cmdq_client;
> > };
> >
> > and in rx_callback function can use pkt->cl to get
> > struct cmdq_client.
> >
> > Fixes: f4be17cd5b14 ("drm/mediatek: Remove struct cmdq_client")
>
> Looking at this patchset looks like you're fixing the above commit by
> reintroducing the 'struct cmdq_client' again, which makes the above
> commit as a non-sense commit. That's confusing and not clear. I'm
> wondering if it wouldn't be more clear if you can just revert that
> patch. Then if there are more changes that need to be done do it with
> a follow up patch and really explain why these changes are needed.
The patch f4be17cd5b14 ("drm/mediatek: Remove struct cmdq_client")
does two things. One is to remove struct cmdq_client, another one is
to embed cmdq_cl
in mtk_drm_crtc (This means the pointer of cmdq_cl could be used to
find the pointer of mtk_drm_crtc). The correct way to fix that patch
is to remove the access to cmdq_client in cmdq_pkt_finalize(), but
that would be a long term process. The simple way is to revert that
patch, but the other patches depend on embedding cmdq_cl in
mtk_drm_crtc. So this patch just revert the removing of struct
cmdq_client but keep embedding cmdq_cl in mtk_drm_crtc.
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
>
> Thanks,
> Enric
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 73 +++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > index 5f81489fc60c..411d99fcbb8f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > @@ -52,8 +52,7 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc {
> > bool pending_async_planes;
> >
> > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
> > - struct mbox_client cmdq_cl;
> > - struct mbox_chan *cmdq_chan;
> > + struct cmdq_client cmdq_client;
> > struct cmdq_pkt cmdq_handle;
> > u32 cmdq_event;
> > u32 cmdq_vblank_cnt;
> > @@ -227,8 +226,8 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp *mtk_drm_ddp_comp_for_plane(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > }
> >
> > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
> > -static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
> > - size_t size)
> > +static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct cmdq_client *client, struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
> > + size_t size)
> > {
> > struct device *dev;
> > dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > @@ -239,8 +238,9 @@ static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> > pkt->buf_size = size;
> > + pkt->cl = (void *)client;
> >
> > - dev = chan->mbox->dev;
> > + dev = client->chan->mbox->dev;
> > dma_addr = dma_map_single(dev, pkt->va_base, pkt->buf_size,
> > DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_addr)) {
> > @@ -255,9 +255,11 @@ static int mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct cmdq_pkt *pkt,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static void mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct cmdq_pkt *pkt)
> > +static void mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt)
> > {
> > - dma_unmap_single(chan->mbox->dev, pkt->pa_base, pkt->buf_size,
> > + struct cmdq_client *client = (struct cmdq_client *)pkt->cl;
> > +
> > + dma_unmap_single(client->chan->mbox->dev, pkt->pa_base, pkt->buf_size,
> > DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > kfree(pkt->va_base);
> > kfree(pkt);
> > @@ -265,8 +267,9 @@ static void mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(struct mbox_chan *chan, struct cmdq_pkt *pk
> >
> > static void ddp_cmdq_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg)
> > {
> > - struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = container_of(cl, struct mtk_drm_crtc, cmdq_cl);
> > struct cmdq_cb_data *data = mssg;
> > + struct cmdq_client *cmdq_cl = container_of(cl, struct cmdq_client, client);
> > + struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = container_of(cmdq_cl, struct mtk_drm_crtc, cmdq_client);
> > struct mtk_crtc_state *state;
> > unsigned int i;
> >
> > @@ -299,7 +302,7 @@ static void ddp_cmdq_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg)
> > }
> >
> > mtk_crtc->cmdq_vblank_cnt = 0;
> > - mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan, data->pkt);
> > + mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(data->pkt);
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > @@ -550,24 +553,24 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_update_config(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc,
> > mtk_mutex_release(mtk_crtc->mutex);
> > }
> > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
> > - if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan) {
> > - mbox_flush(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan, 2000);
> > + if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
> > + mbox_flush(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan, 2000);
> > cmdq_handle->cmd_buf_size = 0;
> > cmdq_pkt_clear_event(cmdq_handle, mtk_crtc->cmdq_event);
> > cmdq_pkt_wfe(cmdq_handle, mtk_crtc->cmdq_event, false);
> > mtk_crtc_ddp_config(crtc, cmdq_handle);
> > cmdq_pkt_finalize(cmdq_handle);
> > - dma_sync_single_for_device(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan->mbox->dev,
> > - cmdq_handle->pa_base,
> > - cmdq_handle->cmd_buf_size,
> > - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > + dma_sync_single_for_device(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev,
> > + cmdq_handle->pa_base,
> > + cmdq_handle->cmd_buf_size,
> > + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > /*
> > * CMDQ command should execute in next vblank,
> > * If it fail to execute in next 2 vblank, timeout happen.
> > */
> > mtk_crtc->cmdq_vblank_cnt = 2;
> > - mbox_send_message(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan, cmdq_handle);
> > - mbox_client_txdone(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan, 0);
> > + mbox_send_message(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan, cmdq_handle);
> > + mbox_client_txdone(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan, 0);
> > }
> > #endif
> > mtk_crtc->config_updating = false;
> > @@ -581,7 +584,7 @@ static void mtk_crtc_ddp_irq(void *data)
> > struct mtk_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private;
> >
> > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
> > - if (!priv->data->shadow_register && !mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan)
> > + if (!priv->data->shadow_register && !mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan)
> > mtk_crtc_ddp_config(crtc, NULL);
> > else if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_vblank_cnt > 0 && --mtk_crtc->cmdq_vblank_cnt == 0)
> > DRM_ERROR("mtk_crtc %d CMDQ execute command timeout!\n",
> > @@ -924,20 +927,20 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> > mutex_init(&mtk_crtc->hw_lock);
> >
> > #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_cl.dev = mtk_crtc->mmsys_dev;
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_cl.tx_block = false;
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_cl.knows_txdone = true;
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_cl.rx_callback = ddp_cmdq_cb;
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan =
> > - mbox_request_channel(&mtk_crtc->cmdq_cl,
> > - drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base));
> > - if (IS_ERR(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan)) {
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.client.dev = mtk_crtc->mmsys_dev;
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.client.tx_block = false;
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.client.knows_txdone = true;
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.client.rx_callback = ddp_cmdq_cb;
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan =
> > + mbox_request_channel(&mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.client,
> > + drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base));
> > + if (IS_ERR(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan)) {
> > dev_dbg(dev, "mtk_crtc %d failed to create mailbox client, writing register by CPU now\n",
> > drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base));
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan = NULL;
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan) {
> > + if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
> > ret = of_property_read_u32_index(priv->mutex_node,
> > "mediatek,gce-events",
> > drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base),
> > @@ -945,17 +948,17 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_dbg(dev, "mtk_crtc %d failed to get mediatek,gce-events property\n",
> > drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base));
> > - mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan);
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan = NULL;
> > + mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan);
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan = NULL;
> > } else {
> > - ret = mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan,
> > - &mtk_crtc->cmdq_handle,
> > - PAGE_SIZE);
> > + ret = mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_create(&mtk_crtc->cmdq_client,
> > + &mtk_crtc->cmdq_handle,
> > + PAGE_SIZE);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_dbg(dev, "mtk_crtc %d failed to create cmdq packet\n",
> > drm_crtc_index(&mtk_crtc->base));
> > - mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan);
> > - mtk_crtc->cmdq_chan = NULL;
> > + mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan);
> > + mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan = NULL;
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists