linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YVW7xoHaLdGHBoEQ@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:29:42 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select
 configs

On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 30/09/2021 14:39, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > 
> >> On 30/09/2021 11:23, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>> [0] Full disclosure: part of my role at Linaro is to keep the Android
> >>> kernel running as close to Mainline as possible and encourage/push the
> >>> upstream-first mantra, hence my involvement with this and other sets.
> >>> I assure you all intentions are good and honourable.  If you haven't
> >>> already seen it, please see Todd's most recent update on the goals and
> >>> status of GKI:
> >>>
> >>>   Article: https://tinyurl.com/saaen3sp
> >>>   Video:   https://youtu.be/O_lCFGinFPM
> >>>
> >>
> >> Side topic, why this patchset is in your scope or Will's/Google's scope?
> >> Just drop it from Android main kernel, it will not be your problem. I
> >> mean, really, you don't need this patchset in your tree at all. The only
> >> platform which needs it, the only platform which will loose something
> >> will be one specific vendor. Therefore this will be an incentive for
> >> them to join both discussions and upstream development. :)
> > 
> > How would they fix this besides upstreaming support for unreleased
> > work-in-progress H/W?
> > 
> > Haven't I explained this several times already? :)
> 
> Either that way or the same as Will's doing but that's not my question.
> I understand you flush the queue of your GKI patches to be closer to
> upstream. Reduce the backlog/burden. you can achieve your goal by simply
> dropping such patch and making it not your problem. :)

git reset --hard mainline/master   # job done - tea break  :)

Seriously though, we wish to encourage the use of GKI so all vendors
can enjoy the benefits of more easily updateable/secure code-bases.

I can't see how pushing back on seamlessly benign changes would
benefit them or anyone else.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog