lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf754b55-90f2-8055-468f-a2b9b76b4d02@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:45:27 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+f3985126b746b3d59c9d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Manually retrieve CPUID.0x1 when getting
 FMS for RESET/INIT

On 30/09/21 17:11, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>
>> But, perhaps adding kvm_find_cpuid_entry_index and removing the last
>> parameter from kvm_find_cpuid_entry would be a good idea.
> I like this idea, but only if callers are forced to specify the index when the
> index is significant, e.g. add a magic CPUID_INDEX_DONT_CARE and WARN in
> cpuid_entry2_find() if index is significant and index == DONT_CARE.

Yeah, or it can just be that kvm_find_cpuid_entry passes -1 which acts 
as the magic value.

> I'll fiddle with this, unless you want the honors?

Not really. :)  Thanks,

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ