[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVX0lxyRxZuN1idm@archlinux-ax161>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:32:07 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mbenes@...e.cz,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: Teach get_alt_entry() about more relocation
types
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Occasionally objtool encounters symbol (as opposed to section)
> relocations in .altinstructions. Typically they are the alternatives
> written by elf_add_alternative() as encountered on a noinstr
> validation run on vmlinux after having already ran objtool on the
> individual .o files.
>
> Basically this is the counterpart of commit 44f6a7c0755d ("objtool:
> Fix seg fault with Clang non-section symbols"), because when these new
> assemblers (binutils now also does this) strip the section symbols,
> elf_add_reloc_to_insn() is forced to emit symbol based relocations.
>
> As such, teach get_alt_entry() about different relocation types.
>
> Fixes: 9bc0bb50727c ("objtool/x86: Rewrite retpoline thunk calls")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
This resolves the instance of the warning that I see with clang-12:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/objtool/special.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/tools/objtool/special.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/special.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,24 @@ void __weak arch_handle_alternative(unsi
> {
> }
>
> +static bool reloc2sec_off(struct reloc *reloc, struct section **sec, unsigned long *off)
> +{
> + switch (reloc->sym->type) {
> + case STT_FUNC:
> + *sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> + *off = reloc->sym->offset + reloc->addend;
> + return true;
> +
> + case STT_SECTION:
> + *sec = reloc->sym->sec;
> + *off = reloc->addend;
> + return true;
> +
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf, struct special_entry *entry,
> struct section *sec, int idx,
> struct special_alt *alt)
> @@ -91,15 +109,12 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
> WARN_FUNC("can't find orig reloc", sec, offset + entry->orig);
> return -1;
> }
> - if (orig_reloc->sym->type != STT_SECTION) {
> - WARN_FUNC("don't know how to handle non-section reloc symbol %s",
> + if (!reloc2sec_off(orig_reloc, &alt->orig_sec, &alt->orig_off)) {
> + WARN_FUNC("don't know how to handle reloc symbol type: %s",
> sec, offset + entry->orig, orig_reloc->sym->name);
> return -1;
> }
>
> - alt->orig_sec = orig_reloc->sym->sec;
> - alt->orig_off = orig_reloc->addend;
> -
> if (!entry->group || alt->new_len) {
> new_reloc = find_reloc_by_dest(elf, sec, offset + entry->new);
> if (!new_reloc) {
> @@ -116,8 +131,11 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
> if (arch_is_retpoline(new_reloc->sym))
> return 1;
>
> - alt->new_sec = new_reloc->sym->sec;
> - alt->new_off = (unsigned int)new_reloc->addend;
> + if (!reloc2sec_off(new_reloc, &alt->new_sec, &alt->new_off)) {
> + WARN_FUNC("don't know how to handle reloc symbol type: %s",
> + sec, offset + entry->new, new_reloc->sym->name);
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> /* _ASM_EXTABLE_EX hack */
> if (alt->new_off >= 0x7ffffff0)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists