linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx5: unify return value to ENOENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211001144550.GV964074@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:45:50 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc:     "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx5: unify return value to ENOENT

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:37:22AM +0000, lizhijian@...itsu.com wrote:
> So sorry, I missed this reply at previous ping
> 
> 
> On 29/09/2021 01:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:48:15PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> >> Previously, ENOENT or EINVAL will be returned by ibv_advise_mr() although
> >> the errors all occur at get_prefetchable_mr().
> > What do you think about this instead?
> Thank you, it's much better.

Ok, applied to for-next

Jason